[tbnl-devel] TBNL survey / re-org

[Edi Weitz]

On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:16:26 -0400, Travis Cross <travis at officetone.com> wrote:

> After you released Hunchentoot, I took a hard look at the source and
> have been considering factoring out the non-portable code ever
> since.  I'd be terribly happy if you beat me to it though ;)

There's a slight chance that this will happen... :)

> Another project on my TBNL agenda that I started part way down was
> seeing if I could remove some dependencies (primarily kmrcl) without
> adding a whole lot a code to TBNL.

LispWorks/Hunchentoot doesn't use KMRCL, so that's the plan for SBCL
and the other Lisps as well.

> Do you happen to be sold on the wonders of the Darcs version control
> system? ;) If you're not strongly tied to whatever VCS you're
> currently using, a public darcs repository could be a real boon.

You wouldn't win anything, because I immediately make a new release if
I add new code.  Im the case of RDNZL I once tried with a public
repository, but although several people had write access nothing came
out of it.  The only result was that it became harder for me and I
couldn't work offline anymore...

Cheers,
Edi.