[tbnl-devel] TBNL survey / re-org

[quasi]

On 5 Sep 2006, Edi Weitz spake thusly:

> Hi!
>
> I'm thinking about re-organizing/purifying the TBNL code-base.  It
> looks pretty messy to me now and I think I could get rid of a couple
> of things if I find the time.
>
> Before I do that, I'd need some info about current usage patterns.
> My impression is that TBNL is used with these implementations
>
> LispWorks
> SBCL
> CMUCL

I use CMUCL

> OpenMCL
>
> and usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone.  Is that right?  Does
> anybody still use TBNL with Araneida?  Does anybody use it with
> AllegroCL or some other Lisp I haven't listed above?  Would people
> be interested in something like Hunchentoot for non-LispWorks Lisps?

CMUCL+mod_lisp+TBNL on a GNU/Linux machine.

Is the performance of huchentoot+TBNL better than mod_lisp+TBNL ?
Anyway a CL webserver would be interesting.


thanks,

-- 
quasi

Utopia Unlimited!