[tbnl-devel] TBNL survey / re-org

[Toby]

Edi Weitz wrote:
> My impression is that TBNL is used with these implementations
> 
>   LispWorks
>   SBCL
>   CMUCL
>   OpenMCL
> 
> and usually behind mod_lisp or stand-alone.  Is that right?

Yes.  SBCL/standalone + SBCL/mod_lisp2/apache2/Debian

> Would people be interested in something like Hunchentoot for
> non-LispWorks Lisps?

I'm not sure what the advantages and disadvantages of such a 
solution would be.


Toby

-- 
Pascal is for building pyramids—imposing, breathtaking structures
built by armies pushing heavy blocks into place.
Lisp is for building organisms . . .		—Alan Perlis