[tbnl-devel] Re: Hunchentoot for SBCL and other Lisps (Was: TBNL survey / re-org)

[Travis Cross]

Edi Weitz wrote:
> As for the implementation, please look into the port-sbcl.lisp and
> unix-sbcl.lisp files.  If for specific parts you know a better way to
> do this, please report it - I'm not an SBCL expert.  See also the
> GET-GID-FROM-NAME function.

I believe that the *CURRENT-PROCESS* symbol macros do not need to
quote their return values.  This was preventing the dead worker
threads from being removed from the server object in SBCL.

Cheers,

-- Travis

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: fix-current-process-symbol-macro.diff
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/tbnl-devel/attachments/20061002/a427f5b0/attachment.ksh>