[tbnl-devel] New version 0.5.0 / Multiple back-ends

[Stefan Scholl]

Hi Bob and list!

On 2005-08-17 07:52:57, Bob Hutchison wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 3:39 AM, Stefan Scholl wrote:
> >Forget it. mod_lisp is much, much faster. 3 to 4 times faster in
> >a local test with ApacheBench against Apache 1.3 + mod_lisp +
> >TBNL, lighttpd + mod_proxy + TBNL, and TBNL stand-alone.
> >
> >Apache 1.3 + mod_lisp + TBNL was always faster.
> 
> Really? That's very interesting. What lisp implementation are you  
> using? I use Lispworks, and in my tests (on OS X and linux, I don't  
> have a license for windows), Apache+mod_lisp+TBNL was second and TBNL  
> standalone the fastest by just a bit better than a factor of *two*   

CMUCL 19a on a Pentium III 650 MHz (2 CPUs), 512 MiB RAM.
Linux 2.6.x (Gentoo)

Tested with CL-WIKI serving a little 30 KiB file.

ab -n 100 -c 5 ...

(localhost)


Regards,
Stefan