[tbnl-devel] Re: New version 0.3.5

[Stefan Scholl]

On 2004-12-01 11:27, Edi Weitz wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:16:34 +0100, Stefan Scholl <stesch at no-spoon.de> wrote:
>>One really strange thing about this: I received a 404, but the
>>logfiles said 200.
> 
> Could you please investigate this? That shouldn't happen, of course.

I don't know if I would stay sane doing so. :-}
Let's just forget about it. It was TBNL 0.3.4 and a "strange" request.


My code throws the 404 itself; no default-handler.
(setf (return-code) +http-not-found+)
     (throw 'tbnl-handler-done nil)

But here it comes:
TBNL 0.3.4, current 1.3 Apache (Gentoo), tested with the "strange" 
request: Reply _and_ logfile say 404.

TBNL 0.3.4, older (but with security patches) 1.3 Apache (SuSE 8.1): 
Reply 404, Logfile 200.

Both servers use virtual hosts by name. The config files differ, of course.

I really don't want to investigate this. Everything works fine with TBNL 
0.3.5. The different return codes were only visible with the "strange" 
requests. All other non-existant paths were (and are) handled correct: 
Reply and logfile 404.

... must ..... stop .... thinking ... about ... this ... aaaaaaaa. .... 
must .... stay .... mentally ....  stable ......