Pure CL unit tests

Luís Oliveira luismbo at gmail.com
Wed Apr 25 08:56:19 UTC 2018


No objections whatsoever. I like Fiasco, FiveAM and RT, but feel free to
suggest something else. swank/tests/*.lisp seems like the obvious spot,
even though we have a couple of Scheme implementations of swank. The
swank/tests system can live inside swank.asd perhaps.

What do you think? Feel free to suggest an alternative layout or test


On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 04:57 Red Daly <reddaly at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm modifying swank-c-p-c.lisp to complete "c:m-v-b" to
> cl:multiple-value-bind, and I would like to add a few unit tests for the
> swank-c-p-c code. There are only .el tests as of now, so perhaps there are
> opinions about including Common Lisp tests in the project.
> Are there any objections to adding Common Lisp tests?
> If so, does anyone have preferences for CL tests? (e.g., choice of
> library, file layout)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/attachments/20180425/00086ccf/attachment.html>

More information about the slime-devel mailing list