[slime-devel] CMUCL unicode strings breaks slime

Helmut Eller heller at common-lisp.net
Sat Oct 2 11:20:04 UTC 2010


* Matthew Mondor [2010-10-02 09:06] writes:

>> 1) Don't support code points beyond 16 bits.  Clean and easy.
>
> What would happen when a CL implementation internally using UTF-32 and
> supporting 24-bit code-points would issue a valid 24-bit character?
> Would this only affect REPL input, or display?

It would work as it does now.  As long as Emacs and Lisp agree on the
number of characters there's no problem.

Helmut





More information about the slime-devel mailing list