[slime-devel] slime repl AND slime-fancy vs. XEmacs

Mark H. David mhd at yv.org
Tue Nov 17 16:37:05 UTC 2009

See below...

-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re: [slime-devel] slime repl AND slime-fancy vs. XEmacs
From: Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr at freebits.de>
To: slime-devel at common-lisp.net
Date: Tue Nov 17 2009 04:00:31 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
> "Mark H. David" <mhd at yv.org> writes: ...
>>  If I'm at all close to right, I would still like to see it there on
>> that main installation doc page.  Couldn't it shown as an example
>> along with explaining that it's a "contrib", but it's the most
>> commonly used one, and then sending them off to the contrib doc for
>> extra information?  That's what I'd like to see.
> It should say that people typically want to enable the slime-fancy meta
> contrib because the default configuation is very minimalistic. 
That sounds good.
> (I don't
> know what "main installation doc page" refers to. It's the README file?
> If not, the README file should be changed, too.)
It's the doc reachable from here:


That's an HTML link --


and a PDF link --


Of course, the README and doc/slime.texi must be changed, too.
> I'll happily apply a patch from you along Madhu's patch. It's the way to
> improve the situation.
>   -T.
> _______________________________________________
> slime-devel site list
> slime-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel

More information about the slime-devel mailing list