[slime-devel] slime repl AND slime-fancy vs. XEmacs

Mark H. David mhd at yv.org
Mon Nov 16 05:43:57 UTC 2009


Things are broken: either the doc is wrong or the defaults are wrong. 
Is there anyone in charge who's not in favor of fixing that?

-------- Original Message  --------
Subject: Re: [slime-devel] slime repl AND slime-fancy vs. XEmacs
From: Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com>
To: Attila Lendvai <attila.lendvai at gmail.com>
Cc: "Mark H. David" <mhd at yv.org>, slime-devel at common-lisp.net
Date: Sun Nov 15 2009 18:17:02 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
> Attila Lendvai <attila.lendvai at gmail.com> writes:
>
>   
>>>> I.e., the first thing I tried.  So, is the basic doc wrong?  What's the
>>>> deal?
>>>>         
>>> The deal is that it's not loaded by default. Don't ask me why.
>>>       
>> isn't it fun reading the mails of the lost users, led astray by the
>> wrong defaults? :)
>>
>> </sarcasm>
>>     
> I'm all for it, but I'm not the one who you need to persuade.
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/attachments/20091116/b2f15867/attachment.html>


More information about the slime-devel mailing list