[slime-devel] Re: SBCL-specific function inspection
Helmut Eller
heller at common-lisp.net
Tue Mar 4 11:47:37 UTC 2008
* Ariel Badichi [2008-03-03 05:17+0100] writes:
> The following patch is a work-around (excuse the pun) to have the
> fancy-inspector use the SBCL-specific method for function inspection.
>
> Ariel
>
> diff -u -r1.193 swank-sbcl.lisp
> --- swank-sbcl.lisp 28 Feb 2008 19:44:14 -0000 1.193
> +++ swank-sbcl.lisp 3 Mar 2008 04:09:39 -0000
> @@ -1041,7 +1041,7 @@
> (loop for value in parts for i from 0
> append (label-value-line i value))))))))
>
> -(defmethod emacs-inspect ((o function))
> +(defmethod emacs-inspect :around ((o function))
> (let ((header (sb-kernel:widetag-of o)))
> (cond ((= header sb-vm:simple-fun-header-widetag)
> (label-value-line*
My CLOS skills are pretty much not existent, perhaps somebody could
help me out on this. Would it be bad style to do the following in the
fancy-inspector?
(unless (find-method #'emacs-inspect nil '(function) nil)
(defmethod emacs-inspect ((f function))
...))
I.e. define the method only if the backend didn't provide one.
Or can ADD-METHOD be used for this purpose?
Helmut.
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list