[slime-devel] Re: Reconnecting, and slime-buffer-connection.

Helmut Eller heller at common-lisp.net
Fri Aug 1 22:22:54 UTC 2008

* Tobias C. Rittweiler [2008-08-01 23:04+0200] writes:

> How would you be going to implement this?
>   a) We could grovel all buffers, and just reset slime-buffer-connection
>      if appropriate.
>   b) Slime-connections are network processes. We could add a level of
>      indirection (putting the process in a struct, say), and make
>      connections reconnectable this way.
> The first option is probably simpler, while the latter may be
> cleaner. FSVO "cleaner", anyway.
> What do you think?

I'd use a) rather than b) as the latter requires lots of changes.  But
rather than a) I would not bother with "fixing" temporary buffers.  It's
easy enough to close those buffers with 'q' and it's also easy to
recreate them by invoking the respective command.  


More information about the slime-devel mailing list