[slime-devel] Re: Reconnecting, and slime-buffer-connection.

[Helmut Eller]

* Tobias C. Rittweiler [2008-08-01 23:04+0200] writes:

> How would you be going to implement this?
>
>   a) We could grovel all buffers, and just reset slime-buffer-connection
>      if appropriate.
>
>   b) Slime-connections are network processes. We could add a level of
>      indirection (putting the process in a struct, say), and make
>      connections reconnectable this way.
>
> The first option is probably simpler, while the latter may be
> cleaner. FSVO "cleaner", anyway.
>
> What do you think?

I'd use a) rather than b) as the latter requires lots of changes.  But
rather than a) I would not bother with "fixing" temporary buffers.  It's
easy enough to close those buffers with 'q' and it's also easy to
recreate them by invoking the respective command.  

Helmut.