[slime-devel] Swank and *features*

Harald Hanche-Olsen hanche at math.ntnu.no
Mon Mar 5 21:00:28 UTC 2007


+ Samium Gromoff <_deepfire at feelingofgreen.ru>:

| As it stands now, it appears that Swank does not signal its own existance via *features*.
| 
| Is there another, more idiomatic way to check for RUNNING-UNDER-SWANK-iness,
| or did i actually spot something missing?

Um, what's wrong with (find-package :swank) ?

If you need to, you can always roll your own
(if (find-package :swank) (pushnew :swank *features*))
so that you can use #+swank or #-swank if that is what you need to do.
But if so, it makes me wonder why you want this.

- Harald



More information about the slime-devel mailing list