[slime-devel] Re: single-threaded swank backend and message loops

[Helmut Eller]

* Jack Unrue [2006-11-05 21:27+0100] writes:

> Does anyone have any thoughts as to what the difference might be between
> the clisp and sbcl backends in this regard, or possible workarounds to
> investigate?

The only backend specific functions used with communication-style nil,
should be CREATE-SOCKET and ACCEPT-CONNECTION.  But it sounds unlikely
that those have much influence on your code.

Does your get-message function return in SBCL if you call it from a
bare SBCL REPL (without loading Swank)?

Helmut.