[slime-devel] Re: SBCL Win32

[Jeremy Shute]

The dominant opinion is that SBCL should grow to meet SLIME's current
requirements?

Jeremy



On 04 Feb 2006 07:13:16 -0500, Zach Beane <xach at xach.com> wrote:
> Jeremy Shute <shutej at gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > The type is there, but not the function to generate instances of it.  Who's
> > working on this, where's the code, and what can I do to help?
>
> The SBCL development list is a good place to start.
>
> Zach
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> slime-devel site list
> slime-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel
>