[slime-devel] Re: SLIME48: a Swank back end in Scheme48

Luke Gorrie luke at synap.se
Thu Sep 29 05:01:56 UTC 2005


Taylor Campbell <campbell at mumble.net> writes:

> I am sorry to those who would have preferred no fork, and I apologize
> for the bother taken to put SLIME48 in SLIME's CVS, but under the
> circumstances and in consideration of the possible advantages that
> more freedom from the current SLIME development might allow, I'd
> rather fork SLIME.

SLIME developers are obviously allowed to hack the code in SLIME CVS.
They do not need your permission.

Good luck with your fork.





More information about the slime-devel mailing list