[slime-devel] Re: Slime and :sb-futex on recent CVS SBCLs
csr21 at cam.ac.uk
Tue Apr 19 11:30:02 UTC 2005
Andreas Fuchs <asf at boinkor.net> writes:
> I'm not entirely sure which of SBCL or SLIME needs to be fixed. Either
> SBCL should start including :sb-futex on its *feature* list again (or
> some other feature saying that threads are non-broken on this lisp
> build), or SLIME should stop checking for :sb-futex (which will break
> on SBCLs older than 0.8.21).
If it's possible given the time constraints and cvs tagging activity,
I'd be happy if the preferred-communication-style checked only
:sb-thread, and if the slime release notes for 1.2 required an sbcl of
0.8.21 or later.
Would that be OK with you guys? Sorry for the eleventh-hour (or even
later) change request...
More information about the slime-devel