[slime-devel] Re: the inspector (warning allegro and lispworks users)

[Luke Gorrie]

marco <mb at bese.it> writes:

> Martin Simmons <martin at xanalys.com> writes:
> 
> > BTW, is there an intentional change to the working practice for commit
> > messages in slime?  I see that you use the whole ChangeLog entry in every
> > file, rather than just the paragraph that describes the changes in that file
> > (without the prefix).
> 
> i thought that was the working practice. i'll be happy to do
> whatever's expected as long as someone would point out what that is.

If you commit with Emacs then `C-c C-a' in the *cvs-commit* buffer
should extract the relevant part of the changelog for the current
file (and strip out unneeded filename info and whitespace).

See e.g. 'cvs log slime.el' for examples.

BTW, this inspector feels nice! I would like source code lines to
break at 80 columns though :-)

Cheerio,
Luke

P.S., sorry about all the spam that has been getting through on the
slime-cvs list, I've changed it to only allow posts from subscribers
or from @common-lisp.net addresses (as sent by cvs).