[slime-devel] FreeBSD+sbcl: sldb fails to pop up
bmastenb at cs.indiana.edu
Sun Oct 10 19:58:04 UTC 2004
On Oct 10, 2004, at 12:56 PM, Ari Johnson wrote:
> Looks like FreeBSD is behind - not all that surprising. I try to
> stick to the ports tree because then upgrades are more or less
> automated and I don't have to manually version-track, but I'll give
> that a shot.
Unfortunately, SBCL progresses very quickly, and releases once a month
- so it's not surprising that ports would be behind.
> SLIME works fine on my Arch Linux box, which has SBCL 0.8.14, so I
> guess that's possible. Did slime have problems on SBCL 0.8.12, or has
> it just been changed to only work with the newer version?
> Thanks for the quick response.
0.8.13 introduced some new features specially for SLIME. As a result,
SLIME references some symbols that aren't external in previous versions
of SBCL, and this causes a compile error.
bmastenbrook at comcast.net
More information about the slime-devel