[slime-devel] Re: implementation type / name of slime buffers

Brian Downing bdowning at lavos.net
Mon Oct 4 17:38:18 UTC 2004

On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 08:13:31AM -0700, Peter Seibel wrote:
> But I *do* like the idea of including the implementation name in the
> buffer name.

Probably better to have a generic "session name" variable instead of
hard-coding it to just the implementation name.  That way you could tell
apart your "webserver", "CLIM", and "scratch" SBCL sessions.  (To me,
the purpose of the session is more useful information than the
implementation that it's running.)

Obviously it could default to the implementation type, or whatever else
is deemed useful.


More information about the slime-devel mailing list