[slime-devel] New argument to ED-IN-EMACS.
Helmut Eller
e9626484 at stud3.tuwien.ac.at
Tue Mar 30 23:19:41 UTC 2004
Lawrence Mitchell <wence at gmx.li> writes:
> While ANSI says that ED should only accept one optional
> argument, it'd be nice if SLIME's ED-IN-EMACS could deal with
> another, optional, position argument, making it more useful as a
> general editing tool, as opposed to being quite lisp specific.
> What are people's thoughts on something like this:
I don't use this myself, but it is probably a good idea. Patch
committed.
Helmut.
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list