[slime-devel] Re: [slime-cvs] CVS update: slime/HACKING
Jan Rychter
jan at rychter.com
Fri Mar 26 18:19:38 UTC 2004
>>>>> "James" == James A Crippen <james at unlambda.com> writes:
James> Helmut Eller <e9626484 at stud3.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
>> Luke Gorrie <lgorrie at common-lisp.net> writes:
>>
> Helmut Eller <heller at common-lisp.net> writes:
>
> > +If you would like to send us improvements you can create a patch
> > with +C-x v = in the buffer or with 'diff -c'. You can also
> > include a +ChangeLog entry describing your change.
>
> Hey, I can't read 'diff -c'! But I'm willing to learn if you can cite
> some virtues :-)
>>
>> I changed it to -u.
>>
>> I too think -c is harder to read. Initially I made a reference to
>> the Emacs manual and they use -c, probably because context diffs
>> have a better chance to apply cleanly. I said -c for consistency.
>> But then I realized that their requirements aren't quite appropriate
>> for our simple project and removed the link.
James> I think they also use -c because it is POSIX supported but -u is
James> a GNU extension. At least, I recall the last time I used Solaris
James> that it didn't have -u in its diff, but it did have -c, and
James> presumed then that -c was a POSIX specified option.
Also, in case someone didn't know, for XEmacs/Emacs users, M-x
diff-context->unified saves the day.
--J.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/attachments/20040326/3cccd424/attachment.sig>
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list