[slime-devel] Re: Tests fail on packages.
Dirk Gerrits
dirk at dirkgerrits.com
Sat Jul 17 00:10:20 UTC 2004
Peter Seibel <peter at javamonkey.com> writes:
> Okay I fixed one of the two unexepected failures and the other failure
> went away by magic. So we're back to only 5 failures, all expected,
> under Allegro 6.2.
Nice! Under CMUCL 18e I still get this one though:
* arglist
** input: (swank:start-server (swank:start-server port-file &optional (style *communication-style*) dont-close))
At the top level (no debugging or pending RPCs)
FAILED: Argument list is as expected:
expected: ["(swank:start-server port-file &optional (style *communication-style*) dont-close)"]
actual: ["(swank:start-server port-file &optional (style *communication-style*)
dont-close)"]
At the top level (no debugging or pending RPCs)
Not really critical, but it prevents me from getting that 'all tests
passed'. ;)
Luke Gorrie <luke at bluetail.com> writes:
> I get the feeling that effort we put into the test suite now as we
> approach 1.0 will really pay off.
Just an idea, not sure if it's feasible, but perhaps it might be nice to
have a daily/weekly/whateverly report of actual versus expected failures
for all supported implementations sent to the list, just like the daily
changelog diff.
Regards,
Dirk Gerrits
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list