[slime-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: install-info

[Richard M Kreuter]

Luke Gorrie <luke at bluetail.com> writes:
> Richard M Kreuter <kreuter at anduril.rutgers.edu> writes:
>> Two patches:
>
> Could you please remake the patches with 'cvs diff -u <filename>'
> and resend? I'm having some trouble applying them.

Attached. Still two patches.

>> Note: the manual and the Makefile probably copyright statements and
>> statements of license...

(Oops. Insert the word "need" in there.)

> I would like to play within the established rules. Is it sufficient
> to just put "This file has been placed in the public domain." in a
> comment at the top, do you know?

I'd suppose so: Debian, for example, distributes files from CMUCL that
have been placed in the public domain. Presumably, Debian is a
sufficient example. Statements of authorship might be a good idea,
though.

--
Richard

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: slime.texi.installinfo.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 559 bytes
Desc: add an infodir entry to slime.texi
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/attachments/20040416/d29aabc3/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Makefile.installinfo.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2209 bytes
Desc: add install and uninstall targets to doc/Makefile
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/attachments/20040416/d29aabc3/attachment-0001.bin>