[slime-devel] Re: Slime and XEmacs
Jan Rychter
jan at rychter.com
Sun Nov 9 21:18:48 UTC 2003
>>>>> "Helmut" == Helmut Eller <e9626484 at stud3.tuwien.ac.at>:
Helmut> Christophe Rhodes <csr21 at cam.ac.uk> writes:
>> Raymond Toy <rtoy at earthlink.net> writes:
> Would it be better if the message wasn't zero-length? I can look
> into changing that if it makes slime work better, and if the messages
> still make sense.
Helmut> That would definitely be better. It should be enough to pass
Helmut> the message to WARN or ERROR and slime will pick it up and
Helmut> place an annotation somewhere near the macro call.
Well, SERIES warnings are rather important -- miss one and your code
will probably be incorrect. Perhaps this should this be fixed in SERIES,
then?
I'm afraid someone more knowledgeable than me would have to do it.
--J.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/slime-devel/attachments/20031109/b0f626ef/attachment.sig>
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list