[slime-devel] Re: Slime/SBCL/FreeBSD oddities

Raymond Wiker Raymond.Wiker at fast.no
Fri Dec 5 17:12:43 UTC 2003


Helmut Eller writes:
 > Raymond Wiker <Raymond.Wiker at fast.no> writes:
 > 
 > > 
 > >         EAGAIN and EWOULDBLOCK are both 35 on FreeBSD... 11 is EDEADLK
 > > with the comment 
 > 
 > Ah, forgot to ask, what is sb-unix:ewouldblock?  I seems that is
 > hardcoded to 11 in unix.lisp.  IIUC sb-bsd-sockets just uses
 > fd-streams and not send/receive stuff.

        Right, which means it's wrong :-)

        I just tried changing the value of sb-unix:ewouldblock in
~/.sbclrc; that didn't work (no surprise...). I'll try dumping a new
image with the correct value, and see how that works.





More information about the slime-devel mailing list