[slime-devel] Re: Slime/SBCL/FreeBSD oddities
Raymond Wiker
Raymond.Wiker at fast.no
Fri Dec 5 17:12:43 UTC 2003
Helmut Eller writes:
> Raymond Wiker <Raymond.Wiker at fast.no> writes:
>
> >
> > EAGAIN and EWOULDBLOCK are both 35 on FreeBSD... 11 is EDEADLK
> > with the comment
>
> Ah, forgot to ask, what is sb-unix:ewouldblock? I seems that is
> hardcoded to 11 in unix.lisp. IIUC sb-bsd-sockets just uses
> fd-streams and not send/receive stuff.
Right, which means it's wrong :-)
I just tried changing the value of sb-unix:ewouldblock in
~/.sbclrc; that didn't work (no surprise...). I'll try dumping a new
image with the correct value, and see how that works.
More information about the slime-devel
mailing list