From edi at agharta.de  Mon Sep  4 10:19:45 2006
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 12:19:45 +0200
Subject: [rdnzl-announce] New version 0.10.4 (Was: example apropos.lisp
 failed to load in ECL)
In-Reply-To: <38C0C9E3083ADB42BFFFC6C2A8B012CE044821BC@WINEX2.imec.be>
	(Goffioul Michael's message of "Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:37:41 +0200")
References: <38C0C9E3083ADB42BFFFC6C2A8B012CE044821BC@WINEX2.imec.be>
Message-ID: <uhczoj5mm.fsf@agharta.de>

On Mon, 4 Sep 2006 11:37:41 +0200, "Goffioul Michael" <goffioul at imec.be> wrote:

> #+(:cormanlisp :ecl) (setq apropos-text (lf-to-crlf apropos-text))

Thanks for spotting that, I've made a new release (0.10.4) which fixes
that.

Download:

  http://weitz.de/files/rdnzl.tar.gz

Note: For now, I'll stop keeping the c-l.net CVS repository in sync
with my local repository as nobody with write access seems to use it
anyway.  If one of you wants to start hacking on RDNZL again, let me
know and I'll re-sync.

Cheers,
Edi.


From edi at agharta.de  Thu Sep 14 07:59:24 2006
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 09:59:24 +0200
Subject: [rdnzl-announce] New version 0.10.5 (Was: Handling of static events)
In-Reply-To: <38C0C9E3083ADB42BFFFC6C2A8B012CE045FAD59@WINEX2.imec.be>
	(Goffioul Michael's message of "Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:44:20 +0200")
References: <38C0C9E3083ADB42BFFFC6C2A8B012CE045FAD59@WINEX2.imec.be>
Message-ID: <uk6463mlf.fsf@agharta.de>

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 16:44:20 +0200, "Goffioul Michael" <goffioul at imec.be> wrote:

> I think that the RDNZL syntax does not handle static events
> correctly.

Yes, you're right.  Thanks for catching that one.

I've made a new release which should fix that.

Cheers,
Edi.


From edi at agharta.de  Tue Sep 26 22:19:32 2006
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:19:32 +0200
Subject: [rdnzl-announce] New versions 0.10.7 / 0.5.2 (Was: Problem/crash
 with RDNZL under ECL)
In-Reply-To: <38C0C9E3083ADB42BFFFC6C2A8B012CE04895B63@WINEX2.imec.be>
	(Goffioul Michael's message of "Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:24:05 +0200")
References: <38C0C9E3083ADB42BFFFC6C2A8B012CE04895B63@WINEX2.imec.be>
Message-ID: <u3bae46ff.fsf@agharta.de>

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:24:05 +0200, "Goffioul Michael" <goffioul at imec.be> wrote:

> Currently, the only solution I'm left with is to set the invoke and
> release callbacks of DelegateAdapter class to null before exiting
> and add nullity-check code to DelegateAdapter class before calling
> those callbacks.

I've released new versions of the Lisp and the C++ code which
implement this - just in case.  Thanks for the suggestion.