[py-configparser-devel] CLOS, structs and ABCL?

[Erik Huelsmann]

Hi Abhishek,

The situation with ABCL has indeed improved a lot. However, I haven't
found the problem at hand to be complex enough to require CLOS, so,
maybe I should delete the comment about ABCL, but moving to CLOS isn't
on the roadmap right now.

Do you feel you have a need for the library to be CLOS based? If so,
could you explain your use-case?

Bye,


Erik.


On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Abhishek Reddy <arbscht at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A comment in config.lisp suggests that structs are used instead of CLOS due
> to an issue with ABCL as of 2008.  Has the situation with ABCL improved,
> given its substantial development since then?  If so, would it make sense to
> abandon structs for CLOS in py-configparser?
>
> --
> Abhishek Reddy
> http://abhishek.geek.nz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> py-configparser-devel mailing list
> py-configparser-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py-configparser-devel
>
>