Another (stupid) question: "find first set" (or "find first zero")
Pascal Bourguignon
pjb at informatimago.com
Mon Feb 1 19:12:48 UTC 2021
Le 01/02/2021 à 19:51, Marco Antoniotti a écrit :
> Duh again!
What?
Note that the naive version is not necessarily worse than the "smart"
one, on bignums. On numbers like (+ (expt 2 1000) (expt 2 10)),
logand, lognot and even 1+ will have to process the whole bignum, with a
lot of memory accesses, while the naive loop would access only one word.
> MA
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 7:47 PM Pascal Bourguignon <pjb at informatimago.com
> <mailto:pjb at informatimago.com>> wrote:
>
> Le 01/02/2021 à 09:45, Marco Antoniotti a écrit :
> > Duh!
>
> What?
>
> (1- (integer-length x)) is not ffs.
>
> 76543 10
> vvvvv vv
> #b11010100
> ^
> 2
> (ffs #b11010100) = 2
> (integer-length #b11010100) = 8
> (1- (integer-length #b11010100)) = 7
>
> (defun ffs/naive (n)
> (check-type n integer)
> (loop
> :for ffs :from 0
> :while (evenp n)
> :do (setf n (ash n -1))
> :finally (return ffs)))
>
> (ffs/naive #b11010100) ; --> 2
>
> The wikipedia page gives algorithms that are better than O(n), but with
> implementations in ℤ/2ⁿ instead of ℤ.
>
> Instead, you can extract the least significant 1 bit using (compose 1+
> lognot) and logand:
>
>
> (progn
> (format t "~@{~32B~%~}"
> #b11010100
> (logand #xffffffff (lognot #b11010100))
> (logand #xffffffff (1+ (lognot #b11010100)))
> (logand #xffffffff (logand #b11010100
> (1+ (lognot #b11010100)))))
> (format t "~D~%"
> (truncate (log (logand #b11010100
> (1+ (lognot #b11010100))) 2)))
> (values))
> 11010100
> 11111111111111111111111100101011
> 11111111111111111111111100101100
> 100
> 2
>
> (defun ffs (n)
> (check-type n integer)
> (truncate (log (logand n (1+ (lognot n))) 2)))
>
> (mapcar (function ffs)
> '(#b110101
> #b1101010
> #b11010100
> #b110101000
> #b1101010000))
> --> (0 1 2 3 4)
>
>
>
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:42 AM dbm at refined-audiometrics.com
> <mailto:dbm at refined-audiometrics.com>
> > <mailto:dbm at refined-audiometrics.com
> <mailto:dbm at refined-audiometrics.com>> <dbm at refined-audiometrics.com
> <mailto:dbm at refined-audiometrics.com>
> > <mailto:dbm at refined-audiometrics.com
> <mailto:dbm at refined-audiometrics.com>>> wrote:
> >
> > (1- (integer-length x))
> >
> >
> >> On Feb 1, 2021, at 1:24 AM, Marco Antoniotti
> >> <marco.antoniotti at unimib.it
> <mailto:marco.antoniotti at unimib.it>
> <mailto:marco.antoniotti at unimib.it <mailto:marco.antoniotti at unimib.it>>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I am wasti.... devoting some time to recreational hacking and I
> >> bumped into an interesting bit fiddling operation.
> >>
> >> I pored over the CLHS, but, while I may have missed something
> >> obvious, I am not sure what would be the best way to implement
> >> such a function using the standard operations.
> >>
> >> Any ideas?
> >>b
> >> Note that it appears that most HW does have an instruction to do
> >> that directly.
> >> Find first set - Wikipedia
> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Find_first_set
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Find_first_set>>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Marco
> >>
> >> --
> >> Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professortel.+39 - 02 64 48 79 01
> >> DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14
> >> 2043http://bimib.disco.unimib.it
> <http://bimib.disco.unimib.it> <http://bimib.disco.unimib.it/
> <http://bimib.disco.unimib.it/>>
> >> Viale Sarca 336
> >> I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professortel.+39 - 02 64 48 79 01
> > DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14
> 2043http://bimib.disco.unimib.it <http://bimib.disco.unimib.it>
> > <http://bimib.disco.unimib.it/ <http://bimib.disco.unimib.it/>>
> > Viale Sarca 336
> > I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY
>
>
> --
> __Pascal Bourguignon__
>
>
>
> --
> Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professortel.+39 - 02 64 48 79 01
> DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043http://bimib.disco.unimib.it
> <http://bimib.disco.unimib.it/>
> Viale Sarca 336
> I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__
More information about the pro
mailing list