In CLOS, instance remorphing considered useless in practice?
jean.claude.beaudoin at gmail.com
Wed Dec 9 10:54:47 UTC 2020
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 4:36 AM Hans Hübner <hans.huebner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the discussion until now, Jean-Claude, what is it that you're trying
> to accomplish with this debate? Are you up for proving that the MOP is
> "wrong"? You have repeatedly indicated that this would be your opinion. If
> so, are you trying to create a new version of the MOP that would not
> include class redefinition hooks? Or are you up for creating a new Lisp or
> a new Lisp object system that is inspired by the MOP but somehow different?
Sorry Hans but I just got a "come to Jesus" moment and therefore had to
consult the scriptures directly.
What do I find in the AMOP, #'cl:update-instance-for-redefined-class and
#'cl:make-instances-obsolete are nowhere to be found in it!
I see this as a sign.
One finds #'cl:change-class and #'cl:update-instance-for-different-class
inside AMOP but not the other two.
I would then be tempted to drop almost half of my case after all.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pro