I’m very curious about this, too. —Scott > On Dec 3, 2020, at 6:19 AM, Svante Carl v. Erichsen <svante.v.erichsen at web.de> wrote: > > So, if it's not because Common Lisp is not seen as “production ready”, > why rewrite instead of just adding the production parts (I guess > hardening, monitoring, logging, documentation etc.)?