[pro] Looking for comments/corrections on Lisp Doc-Generation Tool Review

[Cyrus Harmon]

Not sure if this fits the criteria, but I used my smarkup package for documentation for clem, opticl-examples, chemical, cl-bio, etc… and of course for writing my PhD thesis.

On Sep 25, 2012, at 11:27 AM, Faré <fahree at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Nikodemus Siivola
> <nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, Sabra Crolleton wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello all,
>>> 
>>> I put together a draft of a review of common lisp documentation generation
>>> tools at lisp document generation apps | sabraonthehill.
>> 
> Maybe you should list my exscribe amongst the tools?
> It won't extract documentation from source,
> but it's a nice tool to write documentation.
> 
> And even if you insist on documentation extraction,
> TeX-style literate programming in Common Lisp deserves mention, with
> Alex Plotnick's clweb and Roy Turner's LP/Lisp.
> 
> —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org
> No man would listen to you talk if he didn't know it was his turn next.
> 		— Edgar Watson Howe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pro mailing list
> pro at common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro