[pro] [Q] introspecting setf expanders

[Marco Antoniotti]

On Oct 9, 2012, at 07:52 , Pascal J. Bourguignon wrote:

> IMO, you will have to see what's done by each implementation, and use implementation specific, perhaps even internal functions to get that information. 
> 
> This would be a good subject for a CDR, to provide a public introspective API.

I second that.  A "side" CDR would be to specify other "function specifiers" beside (SETF FOO).

Cheers
--
MA








> 
> -- 
> __Pascal Bourguignon__
> 
> 
> On 08/10/2012, at 15:28, Didier Verna <didier at lrde.epita.fr> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I cannot find a standard way to figure out whether a setf expander has
>> been defined for a symbol FOO (via either DEFSETF or
>> DEFINE-SETF-EXPANDER).
>> 
>> Is there one? Otherwise, I would also be happy with an SBCL-only
>> solution.
>> 
>> 
>> Thank you !
>> 
>> -- 
>> Resistance is futile. You will be jazzimilated.
>> 
>> Scientific site:   http://www.lrde.epita.fr/~didier
>> Music (Jazz) site: http://www.didierverna.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pro mailing list
>> pro at common-lisp.net
>> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pro mailing list
> pro at common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro

--
Marco Antoniotti, Associate Professor				tel.	+39 - 02 64 48 79 01
DISCo, Università Milano Bicocca U14 2043		http://bimib.disco.unimib.it
Viale Sarca 336
I-20126 Milan (MI) ITALY

Please note that I am not checking my Spam-box anymore.
Please do not forward this email without asking me first.