[pro] Lisp 2's and function values.

[Kazimir Majorinc]

On 25.5.2011. 4:51, Matthew D. Swank wrote:

> I have implemented a small fexpr interpreter in Common Lisp based on
> Kernel http://web.cs.wpi.edu/~jshutt/kernel.html. Right now it's a Lisp
> 1, but I am considering trying to make it a more idiomatic extension of
> Common Lisp by making it a Lisp 2.

Did you published anything online?

How would you estimate time / space requirements compared to original 
dynamically scoped FEXPRs?