[pro] Learning Lisp the Bump Free Way

karol skocik karol.skocik at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 11:57:06 UTC 2011


I didn't really about the name that much (unless it's overly verbose).
The problem I tried to mention was the attitude of other developers to
such a simple addition.

Karol

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Tord Romstad <tord.romstad at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Svante Carl v. Erichsen
> <Svante.v.Erichsen at web.de> wrote:
>>
>> I should call it string-conc, conc-string, or conc->string.
>
> I actually agree. What I meant is that if you really want to use a
> mathematical operator for this, multiplication is the natural choice.
> Your suggestions above -- at least the first two -- are of course
> better still.
>
> Tord
>
> _______________________________________________
> pro mailing list
> pro at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
>




More information about the pro mailing list