[pro] Is cl-yacc going to cut it?

Matthew D. Swank akopa at charter.net
Sat Feb 5 03:55:56 UTC 2011


Yeah, that is basically what I'm doing: driving start conditions from
the parser.  One hint that there was unnecessary code duplication going
on was when the state in some of my older lexers started looking like
shift entries in the parser's action table.


Matt
On 02/04/2011 01:21 AM, Raymond Wiker wrote:
> I've used cl-yacc exactly once, and chose to implement "start
> conditions" in my lexer 





More information about the pro mailing list