[pro] Is cl-yacc going to cut it?

[Thomas M. Hermann]

I am absolutely biased towards meta-sexp:

"A META parser generator using LL(1) grammars with s-expressions."

https://github.com/vy/meta-sexp

It seems dirt simple to use, at least to me and the performance has been
acceptable.

Regards,

~ Tom
----------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas M. Hermann
Odonata Research LLC
http://www.odonata-research.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomasmhermann


On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Nikodemus Siivola <
nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote:

> On 4 February 2011 16:39, Paul Tarvydas <paul.tarvydas at rogers.com> wrote:
>
> > The relatively new PEG packrat parser technologies make it possible
> > to use just one universal description for, both, scanning and
> >  parsing.  I see that cl-peg exists, but I haven't tried it out.
>
> Esrap is another packrat parser for CL:
>
>  https://github.com/nikodemus/esrap
>
> I had to parse some semi-structured text and wrote Esrap for that. Its
> primary limitations are lacking support for parsing from streams (it
> wants a string) and very little documentation.
>
> Cheers,
>
>  -- Nikodemus
>
> _______________________________________________
> pro mailing list
> pro at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pro
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/pro/attachments/20110204/ead88cb4/attachment.html>