[pro] code organization and name conflicts
Ken Tilton
kentilton at gmail.com
Wed Apr 13 21:13:23 UTC 2011
On 4/13/2011 2:35 PM, Ryan Davis wrote:
> When working on a larger lisp code base, one with 10+ files in one
> package, I begin to get nervous about accidental name conflicts, and
> was wondering how other people deal with this.
>
> Here's the scenario I'm worried about:
>
> * dsl.lisp, written by a coworker two years ago, has a number of
> small functions that are helpers for the main #'WRITE-DSL-REPORT
> function; one of these helpers is #'GET-WAN-IPS
> * nagios-config.lisp, written by me today, has a number of small
> functions that are helpers for the main #'WRITE-NAGIOS-CONFIG
> function; one of these helpers is #'GET-WAN-IPS
> * I miss the compiler warning about redefining #'GET-WAN-IPS
> * I test my code, it works in my REPL so I commit and call it a day
> * Code eventually gets pushed to production and #'WRITE-DSL-REPORT
> is broken
>
> It doesn't happen very often (and testing procedures usually catch
> stuff before it goes to production), but it seems like there should be
> a nicer way to deal with helper functions that you want to
> develop/test from the REPL, but don't need to be used outside the
> current file.
The compiler warning should not have been missed. We have a "no
warnings" policy so warnings stand out, and I use the option in the
AllegroCL IDE that has it pop up a dialog on warnings (so I /really/
cannot miss them).
I suspect also that there may be a problem with the conclusion that the
code has been tested and works because it works in a REPL.
Absent those two issues, there is no longer a problem. :)
kt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/pro/attachments/20110413/28a598e2/attachment.html>
More information about the pro
mailing list