[pro] substitution macro lisp extension?

[Samium Gromoff]

On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:24:33 +0200, Hans Hübner <hans.huebner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 17:18, Daniel Weinreb <dlw at itasoftware.com> wrote:
> > How is this different from using an "inline" declaration?
> 
> Some compilers ignore inline declarations.  With defsubst, you are not
> at the mercy of the compiler.  I have used defsubst (Allegro CL has
> it) in places where I was absolutely sure that inlining was the right
> thing to do.

This all reminds me of the old lkml glory:

    http://markmail.org/message/uaegqp4xznxupctd

The "inline_me_harder" one is my personal favorite.

-- 
regards,
  Samium Gromoff
--
"Actually I made up the term 'object-oriented', and I can tell you I
did not have C++ in mind." - Alan Kay (OOPSLA 1997 Keynote)