[postmodern-devel] Postmodern Store for Weblocks

[Phil Marneweck]

Found my first booboo I added some doucmentation notes before I mailed
the code and messed up the class definition for dao-store-class...it
should be as follows...


(defclass dao-store-class (dao-class)
((foreign-keys :initarg :foreign-keys :initform nil :reader
foreign-keys))
(:documentation   "Expected Values are for foreign-keys is a list of
foreign-key-id-slot-name 
  foreign-key-boject-slot-name foreign-object-id-slot-name
include-in-delete-p."))

Sorry every one.


On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 20:36 +0200, Phil Marneweck wrote:
> I did not really want to create a separate project for it. I was just
> hoping for some feedback here on this list before I hand it of to the
> weblocks guys. If they are happy enough with it they can work it into
> their repositories. From there anybody that is interested can then hack
> away. 
> 
> I just wanted to make sure that I did not "miss use" postmodern in my
> attempt to comply to what I interpreted to be the requirements of a
> weblocks store.
> 
> I spent a good amount of time digging in the postmodern code to better
> understand how to use postmodern in the store. 
> 
> The main difference between the store and my day to day use of posmodern
> is that the store hangs onto the connection object to re-use it. In a
> sense I already deviated a bit from this by disconnecting from the db
> after using it in the store (anticipating that the store would mostly be
> used by weblocks widgets that have a specific use scenario, giving me
> the chance to reconnect in the back ground).
> 
> The store should be using postmodern's connection pooling to make
> reconnecting more efficient.
> 
> There should also be some tracking of "explicit transactions" so as to
> not disconnect from the db when a transaction is active on a store.
> 
> In the mean time I am using it for a project that has to be finished by
> Monday so it will see a lot of use in the next 30 hours. This will
> hopefully sort out any glaring bugs.
> 
> What is left is bad lisp style and other stupid mistakes...;)
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 18:54 +0100, Marijn Haverbeke wrote:
> > Great! Does it have a project page yet? You should put it on github.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > postmodern-devel mailing list
> > postmodern-devel at common-lisp.net
> > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postmodern-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> postmodern-devel mailing list
> postmodern-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/postmodern-devel