it easy to update the internal workings witout breaking user code. That
is the reason I made the testcode that syncs with the documentation, I
<br>But I can agree that sometimes a higher level language would be nice, and I have also dreamt of all the features mentioned. I am willing to hack on a new language that is more high level, but then I suggest we have two layers:
<br>Parenscript as it is now (defined by my feature list above and the current syntax) as the low level language, call it parenscript-one. A new high level language (parenscript two) that compiles to parenscript one. But I suggest a clear division between the layers.
<br><br>Summary: Thumb up for a nice high level language, but keep a low level language as well.<br><br>/Henrik Hjelte<br>