[parenscript-devel] Loops that return a value

[Boris Smilga]

Also, there is this baddie:

On 16 Jan 2013, at 00:18, David Sargeant wrote:

> (function () {
>     var collect66 = [];
>     for (var num = 10; num <= 1; num += 1) {
>         collect66['push'](num);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>     };
>     return collect66;
> })();

Not at all a major issue, but collect66.push would fit rather better  
in this context.  There are a couple more instances of this kind in  
the code of ParenScript, they all boil down to keywords being used  
with @ instead of literal symbols:

src/lib/ps-dom.lisp:6:  `(@ ,el :inner-h-t-m-l))
src/lib/ps-dom.lisp:12:  `((@ ,el :get-attribute) ,attr))
src/lib/ps-loop.lisp:102:         (then (if (numberp by) ` 
((@ ,var :slice) ,by) `(,by ,var))))
src/lib/ps-loop.lisp:167:        (:collect `((@ ,var :push) ,item))
src/macros.lisp:177:                     (if (eql ,funobj (@  
__PS_MV_REG :tag))
src/macros.lisp:178:                         (@ __PS_MV_REG :values)
src/non-cl.lisp:189:      `((@ (list , at things) :join) "")))

Do you think we should fix them, or is this totally insignificant?

  — B. Smilga.