[parenscript-devel] [PATCH] Implementation of TRY-EXPRESSIONIZE-IF? that doesn't call the printer.
Vladimir Sedach
vsedach at gmail.com
Tue Sep 13 18:23:25 UTC 2011
The reason that heuristic is there is to support really deep nested IF
statements like
http://lists.common-lisp.net/pipermail/parenscript-devel/2009-December/000690.html
I'll see what I can do about "doing the right thing" with deep nested
IFs without using the printer.
Vladimir
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:39 PM, <sblist at me.com> wrote:
> I needed to avoid secondary calls to the printer for the purpose of
> generating source mappings, but this seems like a more precise
> definition anyway (unless I've missed something).
>
> Scott
>
> ---
> src/special-operators.lisp | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/special-operators.lisp b/src/special-operators.lisp
> index 3a77ae5..be95a5f 100644
> --- a/src/special-operators.lisp
> +++ b/src/special-operators.lisp
> @@ -130,10 +130,16 @@
> `(ps-js:label ,name ,(wrap-block-for-dynamic-return name (compile-statement `(progn , at body))))))
>
> (defun try-expressionize-if? (form)
> - (< (count #\Newline (with-output-to-string (*psw-stream*)
> - (let ((*ps-print-pretty* t))
> - (parenscript-print (compile-statement form) t))))
> - (if (= (length form) 4) 5 4)))
> + (destructuring-bind (if condition
> + (block . consequent)
> + &optional
> + else
> + alternative-block)
> + (compile-statement form)
> + (declare (ignore if condition else block))
> + (and (= (length consequent) 1)
> + (or (null alternative-block)
> + (= (length alternative-block) 2)))))
>
> (define-statement-operator return-from (tag &optional result)
> (if (not tag)
> --
> 1.7.6
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
More information about the parenscript-devel
mailing list