[parenscript-devel] what's wrong?

[Daniel Gackle]

< Well there's no reason not to wrap it in a lambda >

Do you mean that PS can detect when the LOOP form is being used as an
expression and turn it into one with a lambda? That would be great.

I hope you don't mean lambdifying all ordinary vanilla loops, though. That
would be not great :)

Dan


On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Vladimir Sedach <vsedach at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well there's no reason not to wrap it in a lambda, so I'm going to
> classify this as a bug.
>
> > Is there something that can help to convert js code to parenscript code?
>
> Red Daly has https://github.com/gonzojive/js-to-parenscript
>
> Vladimir
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/parenscript-devel/attachments/20110324/7eb69093/attachment.html>