[parenscript-devel] Skipping null returns at the top level.

[Vladimir Sedach]

I just pushed a patch that should do the right thing; take a look.

Vladimir

2010/1/27 szergling <senatorzergling at gmail.com>:
> On 1/27/10, Vladimir Sedach <vsedach at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've also found that annoying about macros. I'm going to see what can be
>> done.
>>
>> Vladimir
>
> Thank you. Look forward to it.
>
> By the way, I think implicit return is a very useful feature.
>
> Yong.
>
>
>> 2010/1/26 szergling <senatorzergling at gmail.com>:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if there's an idiom for skipping the generation of a
>>> form completely at the top-level. This is mildly related to the
>>> implicit return feature currently being trialled. Here's an example:
>>> suppose I'm trying to skip over this form:
>>>
>>> (in-package :something-something)
>>>
>>> by using
>>>
>>> (defpsmacro in-package (x) nil)
>>>
>>> An in-package form then compiles to "null;"
>>>
>>> This spurious output may result in errors (I'm using ps to convert
>>> my Lisp code to Actionscript).
>>>
>>> How about using (values) to indicate explicitly that something
>>> doesn't have any return values?
>>>
>>> Yong.
>>>
>
> <<snip>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>