[parenscript-devel] Implicit return for function bodies

[sblist at me.com]

Vladimir and friends,

In the following example, do you think that both
the try block and the handler blocks should receive
an explicit return?

I'm not absolutely convinced, but I think that it
probably should.

PS> (ps (lambda () (try (foo) (:catch (e) e))))
=>
"function () {
     try {
         return foo();
     } catch (e) {
         e;
     };
};"

- Scott

On 2009-11-04, at 12:57 PM, Vladimir Sedach wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Many of you have been asking for this for a long time, and based on
> feedback (as well as my own experience) the lack of this feature has
> been the biggest cause of bugs in PS code, so it's with a bit of joy
> that I just pushed out a patch to add implicit returns to PS functions
> (including lambdas and flet/labels) to the repository just now. Please
> try it out and report any bugs you find!
>
> Thank you,
> Vladimir
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel