[parenscript-devel] Bug: function call doesn't work with symbol macros

[Vladimir Sedach]

In some sense, yes. In another one, that would be PS code that does
not run in CL.

2009/11/1 Daniel Gackle <danielgackle at gmail.com>:
> Well, the Common Lisp equivalent would be
>
> (symbol-macrolet ((fake #'real))
>       (funcall fake 123))
>
> ... which does work. But in PS there's only one namespace, of course, so it
> seems like the form I quoted is the natural equivalent of this one. No?
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Vladimir Sedach <vsedach at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It's not supposed to, at least according to Common Lisp. I don't know
>> what the exact rationale behind that is, but I suspect it has
>> something to do with the fact that you can do the same thing with
>> regular macros, and allowing this would be like crossing the function
>> and symbol/variable namespaces.
>>
>> Vladimir
>>
>> 2009/10/30 Daniel Gackle <danielgackle at gmail.com>:
>> > (ps (symbol-macrolet ((fake real))
>> >          (fake 123)))
>> >
>> > =>
>> >
>> > "fake(123);"
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > parenscript-devel mailing list
>> > parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
>> > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> parenscript-devel mailing list
>> parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
>> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
>