[parenscript-devel] Is Israel a Democracy? -- The problem with intellectually insecure whites -- Should Christians Support Israeli Terrorism in Gaza?

[Gary King]

I can hope to be illustrious but I had _nothing_ to do with this.

very maddening.


On Jan 23, 2009, at 6:47 PM, Daniel Gackle wrote:

> Ai yai yai. I'm going to assume that the illustrious gking has had  
> nothing whatsoever to do with this.
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Lawrence Auster <gking at common-lisp.net 
> > wrote:
> The Jewish State of Israel has no constitution, nor does it name its  
> borders. Israel's hidden constitution is Judaism. Israel's  
> undeclared borders range from the Nile to the Euphrates rivers.  
> Israel's desired jurisdiction extends over the entire Earth.
>
> It could not be more clear that the Jewish State follows a foreign  
> policy which obeys Jewish Law as iterated in the Hebrew Bible, the  
> Talmud, Maimonedes, the Cabalah, and the many commentaries and  
> refinements of same. The Jews are genociding the native inhabitants  
> of Palestine, just as their religion advises, and because
> their religion teaches them to do so. They treat non-Jews as if non- 
> humans, just as their religion requires them to do. They make  
> perpetual war on every nation on Earth, just as their genocidal  
> Jewish God has instructed.
>
> The Jews of Israel are simply being Jews. Jews are an existential  
> threat to the human race.
>
> Israel contains one third of the Jews of the World. It is not some  
> aberration of the Jewish spirit, but the condensation and  
> concentration of the perverse Jewish mentality, which malady also  
> pervades the remaining two thirds of Jewry, who almost unanimously  
> support the Jewish State, and who certainly do unanimously support
> the Jewish People and its consistent and constant crimes against the  
> human race. Israel is Jewry and the danger of Israel is the danger  
> of the Jewish People to all others, as the Jews have demonstrated  
> each and every day of their existence.
>
> The Jews, the entire Jewish People of 15 million, will not relent  
> until they have wiped out all non-Jews in "Greater Israel". They  
> will not stop destroying all other cultures, nations, religions,  
> ethnicities, races, competition, etc. until they are either stopped,  
> or succeed in their ancient quest to destroy the human race.
>
> What Israel is doing is not some reaction to outside forces, nor was  
> the formation of Israel a response to the Holocaust. Israel is  
> simply following the plan laid out in the Jews' religious texts. The  
> Jews have openly planned to take Palestine and genocide the native  
> population of Palestine for some 2,500 years before the
> Holocaust. The Jews have openly complained that "anti-Semitism" is a  
> threat that gives them the right to genocide the Palestinians, not  
> merely since the advent of Nazism, but for some 2,500 years.
>
> The Jewish religion is the Constitution of the Jewish State of  
> Israel, and, to a greater or lesser extent, the constitution of the  
> nature of every Jew alive. The borders of Israel are the range the  
> Jew roams over the entire World. The perverse Jewish mentality is  
> inbred by a Jew's exposure to his parents and to his community.  
> Judaism
> passes in the spit and slobber of Jewish mother telling her Jewish  
> child that he is a "Jew", as much as Judaism passes in the poison  
> and pain of a Talmudic tractate. The secular Jews did not suddenly  
> come to life after the Enlightenment and the Jewish Reformation a  
> body of vampires that appeared ex nihilo, in vacuo, mostly
> atheistical and undetached from formally practiced Judaism. Judaism  
> is the Jew. It is a mindset that transcends and supercedes religion.  
> It is a belief set, a way of life, a perception of one's self and  
> one's relation to the World that makes a Jew, a Jew, and a danger to  
> all of humanity.
>
> In fact, the religious shell of Judaism is like the stretched and  
> infected skin of a lycanthropic pustule. When you lance it to cure  
> the infection, the virus only becomes more contagious and spills  
> directly on the non-Jew.
>
> The secular Jew is a deliberate product of the hyper-religious Jew,  
> a monster created out of the hewed corpses of the fanatically  
> religious Jew, a Golem which is conjured up to enter the World of  
> the non-Jew and poison its blood, and boil its brain with a rabid  
> lunacy that bites and spreads, until the infected community feeds on
> itself and fills the fields with rotting bloating bodies, where once  
> human beings tilled the soil and tended to their families. The  
> religious Jew created the secular Jew as an army of Esthers who  
> seduce with open thighs, broad smiles, and a Siren call that lures  
> in the non-Jew to cast his skull upon the jagged rocks and color the  
> seas
> with his blood, sickened and blinded by the venereal disease of  
> Judaism in secular form.
>
> Israel is not a secular democracy. It is a religious mockery. It is  
> a rabid bat flying to the ends of the Earth, to end the Earth. No  
> one will be free nor safe until the disease is quarantined and dies  
> out.
>
> Source: http://www.ziopedia.org/articles/israel/how_can_israel_claim_to_be_a_%27democracy%27_when_it_has_no_constitution_nor_borders?/ 
> `
>
> --------------------
>
> The problem with intellectually insecure whites
> By Kevin MacDonald
> January 19, 2009
>
> America will soon have a white minority. This is a much desired  
> state of affairs for the hostile elites who hold political power and  
> shape public opinion. But it certainly creates some management  
> issues — at least in the long run. After all, it's difficult to come  
> up with an historical example of a nation with a solid ethnic  
> majority (90%
> white in 1950) that has voluntarily decided to cede political and  
> cultural power. Such transformations are typically accomplished by  
> military invasions, great battles, and untold suffering.
>
> And it's not as if everyone is doing it. Only Western nations view  
> their own demographic and cultural eclipse as a moral imperative.  
> Indeed, as I have noted previously, it is striking that racial  
> nationalism has triumphed in Israel at the same time that the Jewish  
> intellectual and political movements and the organized Jewish
> community have been the most active and effective force for a non- 
> white America. Indeed, a poll in 2008 found that Avigdor Lieberman  
> was the second most popular politician in Israel. Lieberman has  
> advocated expulsion of Arabs from Israel and has declared himself a  
> follower of Vladimir Jabotinsky, the leading pioneer of racial
> Zionism. The most popular politician in the poll was Benjamin  
> Netanyahu — another admirer of Jabotinsky. Prime Minister Ehud  
> Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni are also Jabotinskyists.
>
> The racial Zionists are now carrying out yet another orgy of mass  
> murder after a starvation-inducing blockade and the usual triggering  
> assault designed to provoke Palestinian retaliation — which then  
> becomes the cover for claims that Israel is merely defending itself  
> against terrorism. This monstrosity was approved by
> overwhelming majorities of both Houses of Congress. The craven Bush  
> administration did its part by abstaining from a UN resolution  
> designed by the US Secretary of State as a result of a personal  
> appeal by the Israeli Prime Minister. This is yet another  
> accomplishment of the Israel Lobby, but one they would rather not have
> discussed in public. People might get the impression that the Lobby  
> really does dictate US foreign policy in the Mideast. Obviously,  
> such thoughts are only entertained by anti-Semites.
>
> But I digress.
>
> In managing the eclipse of white America, one strategy of the  
> mainstream media is to simply ignore the issue. Christopher Donovan   
> ("For the media, the less whites think about their coming minority  
> status, the better") has noted that the media, and in particular,  
> the New York Times, are quite uninterested in doing stories that
> discuss what white people think about this state of affairs.
>
> It's not surprising that the New York Times — the Jewish-owned  
> flagship of anti-white, pro-multicultural media — ignores the issue.  
> The issue is also missing from so-called conservative media even  
> though one would think that conservatives would find the eclipse of  
> white America to be an important issue. Certainly, their audiences
> would find it interesting.
>
> Now we have an article "The End of White America" written by Hua  
> Hsu, an Assistant Professor of English at Vassar College. The  
> article is a rather depressing display of what passes for  
> intellectual discourse on the most important question confronting  
> white people in America.
>
> Hsu begins by quoting a passage in F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great  
> Gatsby in which a character, Tom Buchanan, states: "Have you read  
> The Rise of the Colored Empires by this man Goddard?" … Well, it's a  
> fine book, and everybody ought to read it. The idea is if we don't  
> look out the white race will be—will be utterly submerged.
> It's all scientific stuff; it's been proved."
>
> Buchanan's comment is a thinly veiled reference to Lothrop  
> Stoddard's The Rising Tide of Color which Hsu describes as  
> "rationalized hatred" presented in a scholarly, gentlemanly, and  
> scientific tone. (This wording that will certainly help him when he  
> comes up for tenure.) As Hsu notes, Stoddard had a doctorate from  
> Harvard
> and was a member of many academic associations. His book was  
> published by a major publisher. It was therefore "precisely the kind  
> of book that a 1920s man of Buchanan's profile — wealthy, Ivy League– 
> educated, at once pretentious and intellectually insecure — might  
> have been expected to bring up in casual conversation."
>
> Let's ponder that a bit. The simple reality is that in the year 2009  
> an Ivy League-educated person, "at once pretentious and  
> intellectually insecure,"  would just as glibly assert the same sort  
> of nonsense as Hsu. To wit:
>
> The coming white minority does not mean that the racial hierarchy of  
> American culture will suddenly become inverted, as in 1995's White  
> Man's Burden, an awful thought experiment of a film, starring John  
> Travolta, that envisions an upside-down world in which whites are  
> subjugated to their high-class black oppressors. There will
> be dislocations and resentments along the way, but the demographic  
> shifts of the next 40 years are likely to reduce the power of racial  
> hierarchies over everyone's lives, producing a culture that's more  
> likely than any before to treat its inhabitants as individuals,  
> rather than members of a caste or identity group.
>
> The fact is that no one can say for certain what multicultural  
> America without a white majority will be like. There is no  
> scientific or historical basis for claims like "the demographic  
> shifts of the next 40 years are likely to reduce the power of racial  
> hierarchies over everyone's lives, producing a culture that's more  
> likely than any before
> to treat its inhabitants as individuals, rather than members of a  
> caste or identity group."
>
> Indeed, there is no evidence at all that we are proceeding to a  
> color blind future. The election results continue to show that white  
> people are coalescing in the Republican Party, while the Democrats  
> are increasingly the party of a non-white soon-to-be majority.
>
> Is it so hard to believe that when this coalition achieves a  
> majority that it will further compromise the interests of whites far  
> beyond contemporary concerns such as immigration policy and  
> affirmative action? Hsu anticipates a colorblind world, but  
> affirmative action means that blacks and other minorities are  
> certainly not treated as
> individuals. And it means that whites — especially white males — are  
> losing out on opportunities they would have had without these  
> policies and without the massive non-white immigration of the last  
> few decades.
>
> Given the intractability of changing intelligence and other traits  
> required for success in the contemporary economy, it is unlikely  
> that 40 more years of affirmative action will attain the outcomes  
> desired by the minority lobbies. Indeed, in Obama's America, blacks  
> are rioting in Oakland over perceived racial injustices, and from 2002
> –2007, black juvenile homicide victims increased 31%, while black  
> juvenile homicide perpetrators increased 43%. Hence,  the reasonable  
> outlook is for a continuing need for affirmative action and for  
> racial activism in these groups, even after whites become a minority.
>
> Whites will also lose out because of large-scale importation of  
> relatively talented immigrants from East Asia. Indeed, as I noted  
> over a decade ago, "The United States is well on the road to being  
> dominated by an Asian technocratic elite and a Jewish business,  
> professional, and media elite."
>
> Hsu shows that there already is considerable anxiety among whites  
> about the future. An advertizing executive says, "I think white  
> people feel like they're under siege right now — like it's not okay  
> to be white right now, especially if you're a white male. ... People  
> are stressed out about it. 'We used to be in control! We're losing
> control'" Another says, "There's a lot of fear and a lot of  
> resentment."
>
> It's hard to see why these feelings won't increase in the future.
>
> A huge problem for white people is lack of intellectual and cultural  
> confidence. Hsu quotes Christian (Stuff White People Like) Lander  
> saying, "I get it: as a straight white male, I'm the worst thing on  
> Earth." A professor comments that for his students "to be white is  
> to be culturally broke. The classic thing white students say when
> you ask them to talk about who they are is, 'I don't have a  
> culture.' They might be privileged, they might be loaded  
> socioeconomically, but they feel bankrupt when it comes to culture …  
> They feel disadvantaged, and they feel marginalized."
>
> This lack of cultural confidence is no accident. For nearly 100  
> years whites have been subjected to a culture of critique emanating  
> from the most prestigious academic and media institutions. And, as  
> Hsu points out, the most vibrant and influential aspect of American  
> popular culture is hip-hop—a product of the African American
> urban culture.
>
> The only significant group of white people with any cultural  
> confidence centers itself around country music, NASCAR, and the  
> small town values of traditional white America. For this group of  
> whites — and only this group — there is  "a racial pride that dares  
> not speak its name, and that defines itself through cultural cues  
> instead—a
> suspicion of intellectual elites and city dwellers, a preference for  
> folksiness and plainness of speech (whether real or feigned), and  
> the association of a working-class white minority with 'the real  
> America.'"
>
> This is what I term implicit whiteness — implicit because explicit  
> assertions of white identity have been banned by the anti-white  
> elites that dominate our politics and culture. It is a culture that,  
> as Hsu notes, "cannot speak its name."
>
> But that implies that the submerged white identity of the white  
> working class and the lack of cultural confidence exhibited by the  
> rest of white America are imposed from outside. Although there may  
> well be characteristics of whites that facilitate this process, this  
> suppression of white identity and interests is certainly not the  
> natural
> outcome of modernization or any other force internal to whites as a  
> people. In my opinion, it is the result of the successful erection  
> of a culture of critique in the West dominated by Jewish  
> intellectual and political movements.
>
> The result is that educated, intellectually insecure white people  
> these days are far more likely to believe in the utopian future  
> described by Hsu than in hard and cautious thinking about what the  
> future might have in store for them.
>
> It's worth dwelling a bit on the intellectual insecurity of the  
> whites who mindlessly utter the mantras of multiculturalism that  
> they have soaked up from the school system and from the media. Most  
> people do not have much confidence in their intellectual ability and  
> look to elite opinion to shape their beliefs. As I noted elsewhere,
>
> A critical component of the success of the culture of critique is  
> that it achieved control of the most prestigious and influential  
> institutions of the West, and it became a consensus among the  
> elites, Jewish and non-Jewish alike. Once this happened, it is not  
> surprising that this culture became widely accepted among people of  
> very
> different levels of education and among people of different social  
> classes.
>
> Most people are quite insecure about their intellectual ability. But  
> they know that the professors at Harvard, and the editorial page of  
> the New York Times and the Washington Post, and even conservative  
> commentators like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are all on page  
> when it comes to racial and ethnic issues. This is a
> formidable array, to the point that you almost have to be a crank to  
> dissent from this consensus.
>
> I think one of the greatest triumphs of the left has been to get  
> people to believe that people who assert white identity and  
> interests or who make unflattering portrayals of organized Jewish  
> movements are morally degenerate, stupid, and perhaps  
> psychiatrically disturbed. Obviously, all of these adjectives  
> designate low status.
>
> The reality is that the multicultural emperor has no clothes and,  
> because of its support for racial Zionism and the racialism of  
> ethnic minorities in America, it is massively hypocritical to boot.  
> The New York Times, the academic left, and the faux conservatives  
> that dominate elite discourse on race and ethnicity are intellectually
> bankrupt and can only remain in power by ruthlessly suppressing or  
> ignoring the scientific findings.
>
> This is particularly a problem for college-educated whites. Like  
> Fitzgerald's Tom Buchanan, such people have a strong need to feel  
> that their ideas are respectable and part of the mainstream. But the  
> respectable mainstream gives them absolutely nothing with which to  
> validate themselves except perhaps the idea that the world
> will be a better place when people like them no longer have power.  
> Hsu quotes the pathetic Christian Lander: ""Like, I'm aware of all  
> the horrible crimes that my demographic has done in the world. ...  
> And there's a bunch of white people who are desperate — desperate —  
> to say, 'You know what? My skin's white, but I'm not one
> of the white people who's destroying the world.'"
>
> As a zombie leftist during the 1960s and 1970s, I know what that  
> feeling of desperation is like — what it's like to be a self-hating  
> white. We must get to the point where college-educated whites  
> proudly and confidently say they are white and that they do not want  
> to become a minority in America.
>
> This reminds me of the recent docudrama Milk, which depicts the life  
> of gay activist Harvey Milk. Milk is sure be nominated for an Oscar  
> as Best Picture because it lovingly illustrates a triumph of the  
> cultural left. But is has an important message that should resonate  
> with the millions of whites who have been deprived of their
> confidence and their culture: Be explicit. Just as Harvey Milk  
> advocated being openly gay even in the face of dire consequences,  
> whites need to tell their family and their friends that they have an  
> identity as a white person and believe that whites have legitimate  
> interests as white people. They must accept the consequences
> when they are harassed, fired from their jobs, or put in prison for  
> such beliefs. They must run for political office as openly pro-white.
>
> Milk shows that homosexuals were fired from their jobs and arrested  
> for congregating in public. Now it's the Southern Poverty Law Center  
> and the rest of the leftist intellectual and political establishment  
> that harasses and attempts to get people fired. But it's the same  
> situation with the roles reversed. No revolution was ever
> accomplished without some martyrs. The revolution that restores the  
> legitimacy of white identity and the legitimacy of white interests  
> will be no exception.
>
> But it is a revolution that is absolutely necessary. The white  
> majority is foolish indeed to entrust its future to a utopian hope  
> that racial and ethnic identifications will disappear and that they  
> won't continue to influence public policy in ways that compromise  
> the interests of whites.
>
> It does not take an overactive imagination to see that coalitions of  
> minority groups could compromise the interests of formerly dominant  
> whites. We already see numerous examples in which coalitions of  
> minority groups attempt to influence public policy, including  
> immigration policy, against the interests of the whites. Placing
> ourselves in a position of vulnerability would be extremely risky,  
> given the deep sense of historical grievance fostered by many ethnic  
> activists and organized ethnic lobbies.
>
> This is especially the case with Jews. Jewish organisations have  
> been unanimous in condemning Western societies, Western traditions,  
> and Christianity, for past crimes against Jews. Similar sentiments  
> are typical of a great many African Americans and Latinos, and  
> especially among the ethnic activists from these groups. The
> "God damn America" sermon by President Obama's pastor comes to mind  
> as a recent notorious example.
>
> The precedent of the early decades of the Soviet Union should give  
> pause to anyone who believes that surrendering ethnic hegemony does  
> not carry risks. The Bolshevik revolution had a pronounced ethnic  
> angle: To a very great extent, Jews and other non-Russians ruled  
> over the Russian people, with disastrous
> consequences for the Russians and other ethnic groups that were not  
> able to become part of the power structure. Jews formed a hostile  
> elite within this power structure — as they will in the future white- 
> minority America; Jews were "Stalin's willing executioners."
>
> Two passages from my review of Yuri Slezkine's The Jewish Century  
> seem particularly appropriate here. The first passage reminds me of  
> the many American Jews who adopt a veneer of support for leftist  
> versions of social justice and racial tolerance while nevertheless  
> managing to support racial Zionism and the mass murder,
> torture, and incarceration of the Palestinian people in one of the  
> largest prison systems the world has ever seen. Such people may be  
> very different when they become a hostile elite in a white-minority  
> America.
>
> Many of the commentators on Jewish Bolsheviks noted the  
> "transformation" of Jews [after the Bolshevik Revolution]. In the  
> words of [a] Jewish commentator, G. A. Landau, "cruelty, sadism, and  
> violence had seemed alien to a nation so far removed from physical  
> activity." And another Jewish commentator, Ia. A. Bromberg, noted
> that:
>
> the formerly oppressed lover of liberty had turned into a tyrant of   
> "unheard-of-despotic arbitrariness"…. The convinced and  
> unconditional opponent of the death penalty not just for political  
> crimes but for the most heinous offenses, who could not, as it were,  
> watch a chicken being killed, has been transformed outwardly into a
> leather-clad person with a revolver and, in fact, lost all human  
> likeness. ...
>
> After the Revolution, ... there was active suppression of any  
> remnants of the older order and their descendants. ... The mass  
> murder of peasants and nationalists was combined with the systematic  
> exclusion of the previously existing non-Jewish middle class. The  
> wife of a Leningrad University professor noted, "in all the
> institutions, only workers and Israelites are admitted; the life of  
> the intelligentsia is very hard" (p. 243). Even at the end of the  
> 1930s, prior to the Russification that accompanied World War II,  
> "the Russian Federation…was still doing penance for its imperial  
> past while also serving as an example of an ethnicity-free  
> society" (p. 276).
> While all other nationalities, including Jews, were allowed and  
> encouraged to keep their ethnic identities, the revolution remained  
> an anti-majoritarian movement.
>
> The difference from the Soviet Union may well be that in white- 
> minority America it will not be workers and Israelites who are  
> favored, but non-whites and Israelites. Whites may dream that they  
> are entering the post-racial utopia imagined by their erstwhile  
> intellectual superiors. But it is quite possible that they are  
> entering into a
> racial dystopia of unimaginable cruelty in which whites will be  
> systematically excluded in favor of the new elites recruited from  
> the soon-to-be majority. It's happened before.
>
> Kevin MacDonald is a professor of psychology at California State  
> University–Long Beach.
>
> Permanent URL with hyperlinks:
>
> http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/articles/MacDonald-Hsu.html
>
> -----------
>
>
> Should Christians Support Israeli Terrorism in Gaza?
>
> A timely discussion between Rev. Ted Pike and Dr. David Duke, one  
> especially important for the Christians in our audience
>
> http://www.davidduke.com/mp3/dukeradio090122DukeandPikeonGaza.mp3
>
> In this vital discussion, Rev. Pike and Dr. Duke explore the Pro- 
> Israel attitude of some Christian evangelical organizations, and why  
> their position not only goes directly against Christian morality and  
> decency,  but actually is directly opposite of that expressed by  
> Christian Scriptures. Today, Many Christians are instructed that Jews
> and today's Israel has a special covenant" with God. In fact, the  
> New Testament in the clearest of language states that the Jews  
> "continued not in my covenant, and I considered them not, saith the  
> Lord." Here's the quote that Christians aren't supposed to notice.:
>
> 8:10 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers,  
> in the day when I took them by the hand out of the land of Egypt;  
> because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not,  
> saith the Lord. (Hebrews 8:10)
>
> They also don't seem to notice that a 2000 year old Judaic war  
> against Christianity that has been waged since time of Jesus Christ  
> and still goes on today with the most powerful Jewish organizations  
> attempting to destroy European and American traditions, that has  
> even become a war on our Christmas traditions.
>
> Dr. Duke and Ted Pike also speak about how over a hundred thousand  
> Christian Palestinians have suffered with their families from anti- 
> Christian Israel! Christian support of Israel has resulted in the  
> very birthplace of Jesus Christ, go from 90 percent Palestinian  
> Christians to 35 percent today because of Israeli terror and
> occupation. They ask, "How could any Christian in good conscience  
> support the anti-Christian state of Israel, bombing the homes,  
> killing and maiming, torturing and oppressing fellow Christian men,  
> women and children?"
>
> This is a vital show for every Christian reader and listener of  
> DavidDuke.com. Next time, you hear someone say, "God tells us that  
> we must support Israel" you will have the clear Christian answer  
> that just the opposite is true!
>
> For documentation on this be sure to read some of the well- 
> footnoted, sample chapters of Jewish Supremacism and My Awakening.
>
> Source :
> http://www.davidduke.com/general/should-christians-support-israeli-terrorism-in-gaza_7282.html
>
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> You or someone using your email adress is currently subscribed to  
> the Lawrence Auster
> Newletter. If you wish to unsubscribe from our mailing list, please  
> let us know by calling to 1 212 865 1284
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lawrence Auster,
> 238 W 101 St Apt. 3B
> New York, NY  10025
> Contact: lawrence.auster at att.net
> -------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> parenscript-devel mailing list
> parenscript-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel

--
Gary Warren King, metabang.com
Cell: (413) 559 8738
Fax: (206) 338-4052
gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM * gwking on twitter





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/parenscript-devel/attachments/20090125/c8fedb08/attachment.html>