[parenscript-devel] A class of bugs in PS: expressions not parenthesized when necessary

[Travis Cross]

Travis Cross wrote:
>> and here again:
>>
>>   (ps (- (if x y z)))
>>   => "-x ? y : z;"

This now returns:

=> -(x ? y : z);

I pushed a minor overhaul of operator handling.  The old code was badly 
broken, particularly with regard to unary operators and named operators.

Some things that now work correctly:

(ps (new (or a b)))
(ps (delete (if a (or b c) d)))
(ps (! (if (or x (! y)) z)))
(ps (- (- (* 1 2) 3)))
(ps (instanceof (or a b) (if x y z)))
(ps (doeach (x (or a b))))

Any error of expression precedence in PS output is a bug.  Please let us 
know if there are any unsolved cases that you can find.

Thanks,

-- Travis