[mcclim-devel] Official repository lagging?

[Joop Kiefte]

After exporting to CVS, if you put it on github you can use a
subversion-client to access it iirc (they implemented that once as an april
fool joke, but it seems to really work). The only problem is that you have
Subversion's disadvantages: you need constant internet access to commit.
But that is only for the people that don't manage to make the step to git
and choose to use subversion on the repository.


2012/11/1 Michael McDonald <mikemac at mikemac.com>

>
> Personally, I hate 'git'. My old brain has a far easier time making the
> correct mental model for CVS or SVN than 'git'. But that's me.
>
> If you do decide to move to 'git', or anything else for that matter, then
> I STRONGLY suggest you do it in a fashion whereby you do NOT lose the
> history of the files. There's a lot of valuable info in the commit messages
> and the version trees. Just taking the top of trunk from CVS and making a
> 'git' repo from it is not acceptable in my opinion.
>
> Michael McDonald
> mikemac at mikemac.com
>
> On Oct 31, 2012, at 2:19 PM, John Morrison wrote:
>
> Hi;
>
> I also would like to see a single official repository, whether git/github
> or otherwise, with continued incorporation of patches/improvements.  (Some
> time ago I submitted patches for the scigraph portion of mcclim which I
> would have liked to seen included.)  Has there been any movement on this,
> especially as regards quicklisp?
>
> If there is anything I can do to help, I would certainly be happy to do
> so.  Please advise.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -jm
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Manuel Giraud <manuel at ledu-giraud.fr>wrote:
>
>> Rudolf Schlatte <rudi at constantly.at> writes:
>>
>> > On Aug 24, 2012, at 10:40, Timothy Moore <moore at bricoworks.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I was going to save this mail until my current round of mcclim hacking
>> is finished, but here
>> >> goes. I'm not particularly interested in continuing to work with CVS.
>> Are people agreeable
>> >> with moving to git? I'm not invested (at all) in having my github repo
>> become the "official"
>> >> repo, but a site like github has a lot of advantages as a host.
>> >
>> > I'm very much in favor of moving to git.  git-svn works well enough
>> > for upstream svn archives, but syncing back and forth with cvs is
>> > always uncomfortable for me.
>> >
>> > But could we leave the "official" git archive on common-lisp.net?  I
>> > like github, but when I'm checking out a project that I'm unfamiliar
>> > with, I hate having to decide between downloading (for the sake of
>> > example) onixie/mcclim, slyrus/mcclim, mmontone/mcclim and
>> > timoore/mcclim.
>>
>> Same here. I'm too in favor to switch to git (which is clearly easier
>> than CVS) but keeping the official mcclim repository where the project
>> is seems better to me. github is cool, fun, social and whatnot but I
>> find it hard to get an official software out of it.
>>
>> --
>> Manuel Giraud
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mcclim-devel mailing list
>> mcclim-devel at common-lisp.net
>> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mcclim-devel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mcclim-devel mailing list
> mcclim-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mcclim-devel
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mcclim-devel mailing list
> mcclim-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mcclim-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/mcclim-devel/attachments/20121102/27955891/attachment.html>